Closed xrotwang closed 4 years ago
@LinguList I just released cldf-clts/clts: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3515745 . pyclts 2.0 is also on pypi. Should we archive this repo - i.e. mark as archived and read-only?
@LinguList I just realized, the easiest (?) way to do this may be:
clts-legacy
cldf-clts
org (then we can transfer issues to the two active repos there)ok?
Ah, that's a bit of a trap. I watched my email, waiting for an answer - but only adding reaction emojis doesn't seem to trigger an email :)
So while we are at making breaking changes elsewhere, why not
pyclts
to its own repository, trying to cleanly separate data and code