Hi,
thank you for your contribution on this topic.
I am curious to understand how this improved implementation performs w.r.t FAN approach from "How far are we from solving the 2D \& 3D Face Alignment problem? (and a dataset of 230,000 3D facial landmarks" work.
It depends. FAN methods are not dense face alignment while 3DDFA can regress dense face vertices. You have proposed the same issue in here, the author of FAN has a good response. In all, these two methods have their own advantages.
Hi, thank you for your contribution on this topic. I am curious to understand how this improved implementation performs w.r.t FAN approach from "How far are we from solving the 2D \& 3D Face Alignment problem? (and a dataset of 230,000 3D facial landmarks" work.
thank you.