Open 130s opened 6 years ago
I opened a kind of related suggestion https://github.com/ros/ros_comm/issues/1251. Maybe depending on the progression of that ticket, we may shift to ROS_HOSTNAME
and could drop official support of ROS_IP. I'm not sure about this yet.
@mikepurvis I can try opening a PR, but first I'd like you or anyone to confirm my concern is valid.
I would like to have this option as well!
But since it is a environment variable, I get the feeling creating a PR to set any ROS variable would make sense.
My team is in need for this improvement anyways, so I'll start work on this.
since it is a environment variable, I get the feeling creating a PR to set any ROS variable would make sense.
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean a feature to be able to selectively pass all ROS environment variables?
Exactly, maybe somebody has the need to pass ROS_MASTER_URI or something else as well
For research products like Husky, we were never able to assume functional DNS in customers' networks, so it's always just used the ROS_IP
branch of that template.
I'm fine to have some scheme for overriding the ROS_HOSTNAME
that gets set, possibly similar to how the master_uri
check works a line or two lower.
Another option would be to make it only set ROS_HOSTNAME
there if it isn't already set, which would allow it to be overridden in a global /etc/ros/setup.bash
file, as suggested in previous discussions, such as https://github.com/clearpathrobotics/robot_upstart/pull/44#issuecomment-261583868.
I've been running into an issue where I needed the ROS_HOSTNAME
to be the HOSTNAME
appended with .local
suffix. So adding the option to specify the ROS_HOSTNAME
seemed like a good solution.
I ran into exactly the same issue as @magnus-rovco, so for now I hacked this together using some local changes, if this is the direction the maintainers want to go in I can clean the code up and open a PR.
ROS_HOSTNAME
is set automatically when service starts. This can cause communication issue between clients when they can't resolve the robot's pc with the value inROS_HOSTNAME
.Does it make sense to add an option to not explicitly set
ROS_HOSTNAME
(implying I might open a PR)?Environment variables regarding ROS networking are tricky to me (IMO they are for many users...) so I might be wrong though.