I used the default parameter settings using the file named "argument_train_nyu.txt (densenet161_bts setting).
I trained three times but the d1 performance had never reached to the accuracy you published.
According to your paper, it should achieve d1 = 0.885 but my results are 0.875, 0.877, and 0.878.
The only difference is a multiprocessing option.
With 'on-line eval' setting, the multiprocessing option cannot work.
I used lr=1e-4, weight decay = 1e-2, adam_eps = 1e-3.
Could you explain why I cannot reproduce your result?
I used the default parameter settings using the file named "argument_train_nyu.txt (densenet161_bts setting). I trained three times but the d1 performance had never reached to the accuracy you published. According to your paper, it should achieve d1 = 0.885 but my results are 0.875, 0.877, and 0.878. The only difference is a multiprocessing option. With 'on-line eval' setting, the multiprocessing option cannot work. I used lr=1e-4, weight decay = 1e-2, adam_eps = 1e-3. Could you explain why I cannot reproduce your result?