Closed night closed 3 years ago
Thanks for your efforts getting this going. I should hopefully have time to review this pull request this holiday weekend. If it works for you then by all means update the BTTV copy to appease the masses until I've had a chance to review this.
@night
I'd start a brief review but the affected code isn't loaded in the diff because it's "too big" according to GH.
Anywho...
This line for the SPDX code:
// @license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
needs to be:
// @license CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
in order to be considered for acceptance by the server on OUJS. Same with any other "uglified" version if applicable. See https://spdx.org/licenses/CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0.html
Plus they seem to be backwards for the dual licensing... e.g.
// @license MIT; http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
// @license CC BY-NC-SA 3.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
... should be ...
// @license CC-BY-NC-SA-3.0; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
// @license MIT; http://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
GM's metadata policy has always been to read the last key in as primary.
https://github.com/night/Userscript--Twitch-Chat-Emotes/blob/1348602ea9d8209a44c787b7d0ec2444e5332e45/package.json#L21 ... should also, at least, be SPDX compliant for some npm standards.
If you would be so kind to fix this in here it would be highly appreciated... pending @cletusc approval of course.
Thanks for the look. :)
licensing issues are out of scope here.. this is not my project
No problem. At least you both know about it now. :)
@Martii it won't be part of this pull request. Discussion for that should be over in #104 like you originally opened (but I hadn't replied yet).
This pull request will remain as @night originally opened (pull request should be pointed to fix one issue, e.g. not loading on site).
@cletusc I've created so many pull requests in the last few weeks... apologies that it was duplicated.
I scrapped together a release for supporting the new site since you're busy.. perhaps you can improve it a tad too