Closed sfishel18 closed 1 month ago
before:
after:
@rgraue i got an email from github with a comment from you on this PR pointing out that it would be better not to use a static pixel value for this padding. for some reason i don't see that comment on the PR itself though.
but anyway, that's a good call, and i was going to follow up and ask if you prefer % vs rem vs vh for the dynamic version of the padding
@rgraue i got an email from github with a comment from you on this PR pointing out that it would be better not to use a static pixel value for this padding. for some reason i don't see that comment on the PR itself though.
but anyway, that's a good call, and i was going to follow up and ask if you prefer % vs rem vs vh for the dynamic version of the padding
Weird... might be a setting for pr comments. I'll look around those and see
I think %
might be the best for what were looking for here... although im no style wizard, so maybe em might be good too, if we want it to inherit from whatever class its nested in
@rgraue i got an email from github with a comment from you on this PR pointing out that it would be better not to use a static pixel value for this padding. for some reason i don't see that comment on the PR itself though. but anyway, that's a good call, and i was going to follow up and ask if you prefer % vs rem vs vh for the dynamic version of the padding
Weird... might be a setting for pr comments. I'll look around those and see I think
%
might be the best for what were looking for here... although im no style wizard, so maybe em might be good too, if we want it to inherit from whatever class its nested in
updated the PR to use %
, seems to be working well to my eye
76