Closed ronakypatel closed 3 years ago
I think the example is to show you what it would look like with an actual gene id (from ClinGenDB).
{
"@context":"http://clingen.org/models/Gene.jsonld"
"@id":"http://clingendb.clingen.org/Gene/G101", <----The source
"@type":"Gene",
"id": "G101", <---- ClinGen generated id
"symbol": "ILK", <---- This symbol would match the HGNC APPROVED SYMBOL.
"name": "integrin-linked kinase",
"xref":
[
"http://www.genenames.org/cgi-bin/gene_symbol_report?hgnc_id=HGNC:6040",
"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3661"
]
}
So another way via HGNC may look like this.
{
"@context":"https://github.com/clingen-data-model/Gene.jsonld",
"@id":"http://www.genenames.org/",
"@type":"Gene",
"id":"HGNC:6040",
"symbol": "ILK",
"name": "integrin-linked kinase",
"xref":
[
"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3661"
]
}
In the documents created for Gene, is it OK to use actual gene identifiers, eg. HGNC:2344 or NCBI:3, etc instead of G101 or G102?