Closed rrfreimuth closed 3 years ago
NC = ChromRefSeq I believe. I’m not sure about NT.
From: rrfreimuth notifications@github.com Reply-To: clingen-data-model/clingen-data-model reply@reply.github.com Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 4:19 PM To: clingen-data-model/clingen-data-model clingen-data-model@noreply.github.com Subject: [clingen-data-model] Genomic Reference Sequences (#167)
GenomicRefSeq (abstract class) is the parent of both ChromRefSeq (e.g., 1-22, X, Y, mito) and GenRefSeq (e.g., RefSeqGene, LRG).
How would one represent a NC or NT sequence?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
ChromRefSeq is at the level of an entire chromosome, whereas GeneRefSeq represents only the seq associated with the boundaries of a given gene. I think we need a way to represent something in between - a chunk of a chromosome that may contain one or more genes (or fragments thereof).
Per discussion during DMWG call on 3/9/16: General agreement. Will leave this issue open and will address when we go back to clean up the model.
GenomicRefSeq (abstract class) is the parent of both ChromRefSeq (e.g., 1-22, X, Y, mito) and GenRefSeq (e.g., RefSeqGene, LRG).
How would one represent a NC or NT sequence?