1) It should be allele, not variant. And then the provenance is handled in the allele model.
2) I think that the context here is an interpretation workspace rather than an Allele. A paper that is relevant for an allele for disease A might not be relevant for disease B. I'd like to hear from the curators though. The other benefit of linking this to a workspace is that we can see what publications were considered when working on an interpretation, so we have a document of what information was potentially known to the interpreter.
3) Evidence Source: This represents e.g. a paper, right? So is the provenance of this source talking about who wrote it and where it was published, or is it the provenance of how the curation system knows about the paper. e.g. bulk upload of pubmed or targeted entry by person X.
4) What are the other things an evidence source can be? Stuff like external databases/ webpages/ internal data?
1) It should be allele, not variant. And then the provenance is handled in the allele model.
2) I think that the context here is an interpretation workspace rather than an Allele. A paper that is relevant for an allele for disease A might not be relevant for disease B. I'd like to hear from the curators though. The other benefit of linking this to a workspace is that we can see what publications were considered when working on an interpretation, so we have a document of what information was potentially known to the interpreter.
3) Evidence Source: This represents e.g. a paper, right? So is the provenance of this source talking about who wrote it and where it was published, or is it the provenance of how the curation system knows about the paper. e.g. bulk upload of pubmed or targeted entry by person X.
4) What are the other things an evidence source can be? Stuff like external databases/ webpages/ internal data?