Closed ronakypatel closed 5 years ago
We don't need the Disease name and we can remove that... the OMIM will be fine.
Since we are on this topic... I wanted to inquire about one more item. Does the interface associate DSC2⇔610476 with a specific intervention? The following would be the example
DSC2⇔610476 Example Outcome 1 / Example Intervention A = Score ABC
DSG2⇔610193 Example Outcome 2 / Example Intervention B = Score XYZ
Both of the above would be associated to a single report like the one you referenced earlier.
No.
However, the gene might be. But in that case, the outcome will be named as
Gene1 - Outcome1 / Intervention 1 Gene2 - Outcome1 / Intervention 1
Okay, but if I understand things correctly... if this curation was done for "Gene1 & Gene2" and "OMIM1 & OMIM2" it isn't possible (or maybe it isn't necessary) to associate interventions with specific pairs? I think this means the following would occur on a single curation.
Gene1 - "Outcome1 / Intervention 1" is connected to OMIM1 & OMIM2 Gene2 - "Outcome1 / Intervention 1" is connected to OMIM1 & OMIM2
The reason I am asking is what if "Gene2 - Outcome1 / Intervention 1" shouldn't be associated to OMIM2 and should only be related to OMIM1? Maybe this isn't how things are curated though and may not be an issue.
Cleanup - Closing old issue.
In the AWG curated data, there is no place where name of diseases are captured for each OMIM. We do store OMIM identifiers but not the names associated with each of them. One can easily get the names from the identifiers, though.
Say for example: the gene-disease pairs given here (https://www.clinicalgenome.org/working-groups/actionability/projects-initiatives/actionability-evidence-based-summaries/) for ARVD include:
Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia,Familial, 9; ARVD9 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia, Familial, 8; ARVD8 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia,Familial, 11; ARVD11 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia, Familial, 5; ARVD5 Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia, Familial, 10; ARVD10
In the AWG provided summaries (https://www.clinicalgenome.org/site/assets/files/6360/binning_arvd_05252016.pdf), there is no mention of any of these subtypes (although OMIMs are there) directly, neither it is in the curation interface.
In the curation interface, the following information is there:
Document: Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia
Has genes: PKP2, DSP, DSC2, TMEM43, DSG2
With these pairs: DSC2⇔610476 DSG2⇔610193 DSP⇔607450 PKP2⇔609040 TMEM43⇔604400
Providing just OMIMs (and not actual name) should hopefully be fine?