search

cliu98 / STA9750-2024-FALL

Projects from STA9750-2024-FALL
0 stars 0 forks source link

STA/OPR 9750 cliu98 MiniProject #03 #4

Open cliu98 opened 5 days ago

cliu98 commented 5 days ago

Hi @michaelweylandt!

I've uploaded my work for MiniProject #03 - check it out!

https://cliu98.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp03.html

michaelweylandt commented 3 days ago

Thanks @cliu98 !

Peer Feedback:

It is now time for the peer feedback round for Mini-Project 03. Please review @cliu98's submission for this mini-project and provide peer feedback.

Using the rubric at https://michael-weylandt.com/STA9750/miniprojects/mini03.html#rubric, please grade their submission out of a total of 50 points. Note that this rubric is slightly different than that used for Mini-Projects 01 and 02.

For each of the five categories, please give them a separate score and provide a total (sum) score across the entire assignment. Feel free to assign extra credit if you feel it is warranted (following the rubric).

If you give a score of less than 5 for any category, please provide a suggestion for improvement. (You can also give suggestions for any element they did well - more feedback is always great!)

As you go through this peer feedback exercise, think about what you particularly like about this submission and how you can incorporate that approach in your future work. If something is particularly insightful or creative, give some kudos!

Evaluators: This should take you around 15 minutes per peer feedback. You are not required to engage in substantial back-and-forth with @cliu98, but you are of course welcome to initiate a discussion.

@cliu98: please engage fully with your peers. They are here to help you!

Submission URL should be: https://cliu98.github.io/STA9750-2024-FALL/mp03.html

Feel free to link to other repos, the course documentation, or other useful examples.

Thanks! @michaelweylandt

CC: @charles-ramirez

nikitagtm commented 5 hours ago

Congratulations @cliu98 for completing your Mini03

What I Liked: Comprehensive Introduction: The project clearly explains the Electoral College system and its allocation schemes. Detailed Analysis: Each allocation method is thoroughly examined with clear and insightful tables. Visualization: The animated plot showing changes in election results over the years is particularly impressive and adds great value to the analysis. Code Organization: The code is clean and effectively uses code collapsing.

Suggestions for Improvement: Formatting and Display: Separating questions into distinct subsections (e.g., 4.1, 4.2) would improve readability and organization for the audience. Written Communication for Choropleth Maps: Add a brief explanation after each graph to summarize the insights it conveys.

Rating: Written Communication: 9/10 Project Skeleton: 10/10 Formatting & Display: 9/10 Code Quality: 10/10 Data Preparation: 10/10

Total: 48