Closed jeaye closed 7 years ago
Adding a regression test. Gimme a bit before merging, please.
Ok, all set on my end. A new version deployed, after merging this, would be much appreciated. Then I can start to propagate the version changes up to jerks-whistling-tunes and then ring-gatekeeper. :)
@ztellman Any chance of getting a release soon?
Just cut 0.2.3-alpha1
, sorry for the delay. Please feel free to follow up sooner in the future, this just completely slipped my mind.
@ztellman Thank you. For how long are byte-streams releases typically in alpha? I'm wondering if I should hold off on the PRs to other libs until 0.2.3
is out.
Which other libraries? The :reload-all
workflow is not a typical one (for basically the reasons we ran into here), and it can be fixed by overwriting the dependencies in your project if you need it fixed. If this is affecting lots of people, I'm happy to cut a new release, but usually I'd wait for a few other changes to accumulate.
I have been waiting to update https://github.com/aprobus/jerks-whistling-tunes/ (some discussion here) to resolve this issue so that I can ultimately update https://github.com/jeaye/ring-gatekeeper (and, ideally, its upstream).
The :reload-all
workflow is essential for any non-trivial, repl-driven server development; I don't see how else it would work.
I just update single namespaces, and avoid anything which holds onto references to older implementations. Perhaps I'm in the minority there, however. I have no objection to cutting a full release, can you just double-check that this alpha release resolves all your issues?
Part of the reason that we take this :reload-all
approach is due to clojure.spec. Since we have specs for the vast majority of our functions and data, and changing some code may invalidate previous specs, or add new specs, having a single restart!
function in a my-proj.dev
namespace, which does a :reload-all
and then re-instruments the code with the new specs (using orchestra) means that we're always running with up-to-date instrumentation for our specs. I appreciate you taking the time to understand this.
With all of that said, I have verified that 0.2.2
has the issue and 0.2.3-alpha1
does not. :)
@ztellman What's the verdict on this?
Sorry, I keep getting side-tracked. I'll cut the release now.
0.2.3
is available, sorry for the delay.
Thank you!
Fix #26
Adding
?w=1
will rule out the whitespace differences and show just the couple of lines that changed. Here's a link: https://github.com/ztellman/byte-streams/pull/27/files?w=1