Closed DerGuteMoritz closed 1 year ago
Does it also fix #34?
Does it also fix #34?
Pretty sure it would (this patch was derived from the workaround in that ticket's description). However, according to https://github.com/clj-commons/byte-streams/issues/34#issuecomment-1138168703 it wasn't reproducible anymore in that particular context so I didn't try anymore.
Can you make Eastwood stop complaining about the changes?
Done!
Indeed, that's unfortunate :shrug:
Note that I don't have merge rights myself here so you'll have to do the honors :slightly_smiling_face:
Dammit, let me see about adding you as a contributor
@DerGuteMoritz Try merging now
Thanks! :pray:
Since this function is usually not called at runtime, the reflection performance penalty should be tolerable.
Fixes #68