Closed pyr closed 3 years ago
(the build failure seems unrelated and triggers on master as well)
If #172 goes in I will rebase on top of it to make the build pass
It now builds thanks to #172, happy to have more thoughts on whether this is a good idea or not
I think that's a great idea, I also need to (apply d/zip' deferreds)
often.
any interest in this one?
@pyr Thanks again for your hard work, but I really think the new functions are just too similar. While I agree zipseq
's param behavior may be the better default choice compared to when Manifold was first written, I'm not sure the improvement is enough to justify having two sets of almost-identical fns in the namespace.
Hi!
In a number of cases I find myself having to wait on a collection of deferreds. While it's fine to
apply zip'
, I find this to improve legibility of the resulting code.Am I missing an obvious way to do this?