Closed lread closed 1 week ago
Thanks for taking a peek @coyotesqrl. I think this matches what we discussed. If you have any other feedback, happy to hear it!
@seancorfield when you have some time and some interest, this PR awaits your review.
Sorry, last week got completely derailed which was when I said I would review this...
Thanks! And no problem @seancorfield, I understand that folks get busy and distracted!
See README for general description.
New option is mutually exclusive to
--fail-on-result
; if both are specified, clj-watson fails fast with usage error and help.Conservatively derives score when missing or suspicious looking:
0.0
but with a valid looking severity; we treat a score of 0.0 as suspicious.Also:
assoc-some
fn (cribbed clj-kondo which cribbed from medley).Closes #114