clld / glottolog3

glottolog2 re-implemented as CLLD app
MIT License
110 stars 27 forks source link

Populate `Ref.language_note` #70

Closed xrotwang closed 6 years ago

xrotwang commented 7 years ago

Previously, Ref.language_note was filled with the content of the lgcode field of a BibTeX record. This isn't done so far for the new DB initialization. If we reinstitute it, though, we may want to cleanup/polish the format of these field - @d97hah possibly even allow markdown?

d97hah commented 7 years ago

Sure

2017-03-30 9:08 GMT+02:00 Robert Forkel notifications@github.com:

Previously, Ref.language_note was filled with the content of the lgcode field of a BibTeX record. This isn't done so far for the new DB initialization. If we reinstitute it, though, we may want to cleanup/polish the format of these field - @d97hah https://github.com/d97hah possibly even allow markdown?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/clld/glottolog3/issues/70, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUDyD1poVnQkyuTIcLJeVL5bfVICb3sks5rq1UEgaJpZM4Mt8tI .

xrotwang commented 7 years ago

@d97hah Does that mean you'd actually use this feature - i.e. make the comments more extensive? Other than the conversion before rendering on the web, there would also be another price for this more expressive syntax: the markdown link syntax [label](url) could possibly conflict with the syntax for language identifiers [abc]. So if we'd change to allowing markdown, I'd say we also switch the language identifiers to glottocodes to make them less ambiguous.

d97hah commented 7 years ago

No I wouldn't use markdown myself (don't know how I would need it). label is syntactically distinguishable from [abc] I think, in that sq brackets denote [abc] unless immediately followed by (.

2017-03-30 9:58 GMT+02:00 Robert Forkel notifications@github.com:

@d97hah https://github.com/d97hah Does that mean you'd actually use this feature - i.e. make the comments more extensive? Other than the conversion before rendering on the web, there would also be another price for this more expressive syntax: the markdown link syntax label could possibly conflict with the syntax for language identifiers [abc]. So if we'd change to allowing markdown, I'd say we also switch the language identifiers to glottocodes to make them less ambiguous.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/clld/glottolog3/issues/70#issuecomment-290332420, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUDyABXEHWnZuxcSNA-k8MZg5fKNnVQks5rq2CKgaJpZM4Mt8tI .