Dylan/unity-tutorials-csharp-parity

[dylanh724]

Prereqs

This PR is dependent on my other PR, https://github.com/clockworklabs/spacetime-docs/pull/28. If the other PR is still open, please review that 1st.

About

• Overview was added to the Unity tutorial section.
• In the Unity pt1 tutorial, a C# variant was added to parity the Rust module in a tutorial split.
• Unity tutorial was split into Basic Multiplayer and Advanced sections.

Why?

• Despite being a Unity tutorial (where the user likely already knows C#), the tutorial exampled only a Rust module.
• Having Rust as the only tutorial option created friction when the user is already learning multiple new things: The SpacetimeDB architecture, the CLI, the client SDK and server SDK. If they previously did not know Rust, this could add some weight to the onboarding friction.
• The Unity tutorial could use an overview since it's lengthy and progressive.
• Part1 should be split, anyway - it covers way too much for a single section to handle (especially since it jumps between client and server).
• Splitting the sections between basic multiplayer + advanced makes things more-manageable and less intimidating.

Before

• UNITY TUTORIAL
  • Part1 (Client + Rust Server)
  • Part2 (Resources and Scheduling)
  • Part3 (BitCraft Mini)

After

• UNITY TUTORIAL - BASIC MULTIPLAYER
  • Overview
  • Part1 (Setup)
  • Part2a (Rust Server)
  • Part2b (C# Server)
  • Part3 (Client)
• UNITY TUTORIAL - ADVANCED
  • Part4 (Resources and Scheduling)
  • Part5 (BitCraft Mini)

Note

I linked the entire file to a public gist post. This may look more professional if this was moved to a more "official" looking account for either now (this PR) or in the future.

[dylanh724]

⚠️All of the Unity section is deprecated in this PR and will be replaced by spacetime-docs::Dylan/refactor/unity tutorial revamp, thanks to a new Unity tutorial that was assigned later.

There are still outside edits here worth visiting:

[dylanh724]

All issues resolved ( @bfops )

[bfops]

Thanks @dylanh724 ! I think this looks good, but possibly one last tweak?

[dylanh724]

Thanks @dylanh724 ! I think this looks good, but possibly one last tweak?

Sure thing - done!