Open matthewadams opened 6 years ago
Thanks for this issue, but to be honest I don't think it's a good idea to bundle fluentd with this chart:
Fair enough. Obvi, I didn't know about fluent-bit
, so I'll look into that.
One of the things I did in the PR was to make external exposure of things optional. Perhaps that's worth taking. Up to you.
Thanks for looking.
Personally I had enough issues with ELK on k8s to know that it's not particularly easy to maintain and there are no two exactly identical setups.
Because of that and the other arguments above I'm against bundling Elastic and Fluent together, but let's wait for other opinions.
Thanks for contributing anyway!
Issue Type FEATURE REQUEST
Description Adding an optional Fluentd chart makes it easy to achieve a complete initial logging solution. The current chart only configures half of the solution.
Version of Helm and Kubernetes:
What happened: I installed the chart & none of my containers were ingesting logs to ElasticSearch.
What you expected to happen: I expected my containers' logs to appear in ElasticSearch.
How to reproduce it:
stdout
and/orstderr
.*
as the index and elect not to use timestamping.Anything else we need to know: My PR, based on https://github.com/fluent/fluentd-kubernetes-daemonset/blob/master/fluentd-daemonset-elasticsearch.yaml, makes the user opt-in in order to remain backward compatible with the current behavior.