Closed vemv closed 6 months ago
Sounds good to me. Maybe choose a more obvious name? rename loggers
to included-loggers
, and use excluded-loggers
?
I guess we can perform that breaking change and smooth it out Elisp-side.
However I'd prefer loggers-allowlist (or loggers-whitelist) to clearly reflect that that only allowlisted would make it in.
(as I see it, included-loggers
doesn't capture so well the "exclusive inclusion" concept).
Self-assigned.
Ok, let's go with allow/block (or anything similar) rather than black/white.
I'd like to exclude certain loggers, e.g.
org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server
,org.eclipse.jetty.server.AbstractConnector
I don't think this is nicely expressable with the current filters.
pattern
operates on the message, not loggerloggers
is an allowlist, not a blocklistSo I was thinking of introducing a
logger-pattern
orloggers-blocklist
. Maybe both.Thoughts? @r0man