Closed mrroman closed 7 years ago
Hi,
I don't have profiles.clj file. CIDER runs leiningen with this command:
/usr/local/bin/lein update-in :dependencies conj [acyclic/squiggly-clojure "0.1.7"] -- update-in :dependencies conj [org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [org.clojure/clojure]] -- update-in :plugins conj [refactor-nrepl "2.3.0-SNAPSHOT"] -- update-in :plugins conj [cider/cider-nrepl "0.15.0-SNAPSHOT"] -- repl :headless
I've tried to isolate the issue and you can reproduce the issue with:
lein new some-project
My emacs settings are available here: https://github.com/mrroman/emacs.d.
PS. I don't see your comment added to github issue.
śr., 15 lut 2017 o 11:57 użytkownik Lars Andersen notifications@github.com napisał:
When I install squiggly-clojure and flycheck-clojure
This is the same project. Squiggly-clojure was the old name for the project.
How are you installing it? What does your profiles.clj look like? Is it broken in a lein new test project or just the project you're working on now? If so, what's that's project project.clj
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/clojure-emacs/squiggly-clojure/issues/45#issuecomment-279980419, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGAhs3hDfHYSTJTv7voODX7lgrTLaRwks5rctoVgaJpZM4MBkST .
Could you try removing the (use-package flycheck-clojure ...)
and verifying that you can now cider-jack-in
without error?
Yes. I did that and the warning disappeared.
Odd. Could you try running, outside of emacs
/usr/local/bin/lein update-in :dependencies conj [acyclic/squiggly-clojure "0.1.7"] -- update-in :dependencies conj [org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [org.clojure/clojure]] -- update-in :plugins conj [refactor-nrepl "2.3.0-SNAPSHOT"] -- update-in :plugins conj [cider/cider-nrepl "0.15.0-SNAPSHOT"] -- deps :tree
On Feb 16, 2017, at 3:58 PM, Konrad Mrożek notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes. I did that and the warning disappeared.
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Here is the output:
Possibly confusing dependencies found:
[org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [org.clojure/clojure]]
overrides
[org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [org.clojure/clojure]]
Consider using these exclusions:
[acyclic/squiggly-clojure "0.1.7"]
[environ "1.0.0"]
[jonase/eastwood "0.2.3" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[org.clojars.brenton/google-diff-match-patch "0.1"]
[org.ow2.asm/asm-all "4.2"]
[jonase/kibit "0.1.3"]
[org.clojure/core.logic "0.8.11"]
[org.clojure/tools.cli "0.3.5"]
[org.clojure/core.typed "0.3.26" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[org.clojure/core.cache "0.6.4"]
[org.clojure/data.priority-map "0.0.4"]
[org.clojure/core.typed.rt "0.3.26"]
[org.clojure/math.combinatorics "0.1.3" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[org.clojure/tools.analyzer.jvm "0.6.8"]
[org.clojure/core.memoize "0.5.7"]
[org.clojure/tools.analyzer "0.6.7"]
[org.clojure/tools.namespace "0.3.0-alpha3"]
[org.clojure/java.classpath "0.2.3"]
[org.clojure/tools.reader "1.0.0-beta3"]
[org.clojure/data.json "0.2.6"]
[cider/cider-nrepl "0.15.0-20170207.071608-9"]
[org.tcrawley/dynapath "0.2.5" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[clojure-complete "0.2.4" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[org.clojure/clojure "1.8.0"]
[org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[refactor-nrepl "2.3.0-20170210.162113-13"]
The same without squiggly:
Possibly confusing dependencies found:
[org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [org.clojure/clojure]]
overrides
[org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [org.clojure/clojure]]
Consider using these exclusions:
[cider/cider-nrepl "0.15.0-20170207.071608-9"]
[org.tcrawley/dynapath "0.2.5" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[clojure-complete "0.2.4" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[org.clojure/clojure "1.8.0"]
[org.clojure/tools.nrepl "0.2.12" :exclusions [[org.clojure/clojure]]]
[refactor-nrepl "2.3.0-20170210.162113-13"]
I can replicate this now. For some reason, the error does not occur when I specify dependencies in an equivalent profiles.clj
, and since that's how I usually operate, I wouldn't normally encounter this.
Since the version of cider-nrepl
as reported by lein deps
is in fact correct, I don't know that the cider warning is correct, and in fact I haven't seen any indication myself that "things will break".
Have you noticed any problems beyond the frightening warning from cider?
I don't write those dependencies in the profiles.clj, because it causes longer lein startup. I didn't check that thorough the consequences. I'm trying to investigate now, why "describe" opcode doesn't return the :aux section :).
Put the dependencies in the :repl
profile, and they won't affect lein startup for other uses.
I wanted to use lein repl without loading cider-nrepl etc. :). I've isolated the problem. The issue is caused by core.typed "0.3.26"
. When I downgraded it to core.typed "0.3.7"
, the warning was gone.
I've isolated it further and it seems that it broke between core.typed 0.3.25 and 0.3.26.
Did you see anything broken other than the "things will break" message?
This seems to be related to AOT jars introduced with 0.3.26 @frenchy64 suggested adding :classifier "slim"
after the "0.3.32"
and indeed that "fixes" the problem (though I still don't know why).
Latest update to squiggly 0.1.9-SNAPSHOT
contains this and a few other changes.
When I install squiggly-clojure and flycheck-clojure in the Emacs, CIDER reports a warning:
"WARNING: CIDER's version (0.14.0) does not match cider-nrepl's version (nil). Things will break!”.
I've tried sending with CIDER a request by
(nrepl-send-sync-request '("op" "describe") (current-buffer))
and it doesn’t returnaux
dictionary.I have Leiningen 2.7.1 and I use cider-stable. It has to be a dependency issue, because after removing squiggly dependencies, CIDER doesn't report error.