Closed plexus closed 8 years ago
@plexus thanks for raising these important questions. 👍
I definitely want to make it more clear that trans folks, genderqueer, agender, & intersex people are welcome. I don't think just saying women
makes that clear.
In German space I often see the description FLTI: (Frauen, Lesben, Trans- & Intersex)
Taken from here
FLTI - "Frauen, Lesben, Inter*, Trans*": "women, lesbians, intersex- & trans people"
is often used to describe the groups invited to a certain event or location.
Often with * placed after the T and/or I, sometimes without mentioning intersex as "FLT".
Ideally means "everyone except non-intersex cis men", but since these evolved from
women-only spaces, results vary and the reality can be exlusive of
some trans and intersex people.
for me, either we include (everyone who identifies as women + genderqueer folx), or everyone but cis men (e.g. also including trans men...stepping away from "clojure workshop for women"...)
in which case it's pretty important to also change the way we talk about the workshop in general. i.e. stop advertising it as workshop for women
.
Background: during organization of the previous workshop there was some discussion about who this workshop is for, and how we phrase that in our materials.
IIRC correctly the consensus was to be inclusive without making it too complicated, i.e. we describe our target group as "women or those who identify as women".
Unfortunately this didn't result in a visible change, so e.g. the website still just says "women" without qualifying this.
I had a look at what other chapters are doing. Most just use the standard ClojureBridge boilerplate, but I found a few other examples (see below).
This is what I'm proposing. I'm including "nonbinary", which I think would include e.g. genderqueer, genderfluid, agender. (We already had one nonbinary person sign up for this workshop).
Questions:
For reference: