Corrected typo in ### `reduce*` operation example

[michaelklishin]

I'd prefer the entire example to be switched to let.

[maacl]

Wouldn't it make sense to rewrite all the stream processing examples in that fashion then?

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Michael Klishin notifications@github.comwrote:

I'd prefer the entire example to be switched to let.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/clojurewerkz/meltdown/pull/2#issuecomment-24887871 .

[ifesdjeen]

It will, you're right

[michaelklishin]

@maacl sounds like a good idea (but also no longer a few minutes of work). Feel free ;)

[maacl]

Sure. Something like this(just to be sure before I do them all :-))

(let [channel (create)
      incremented-values (map* inc channel)
      decremented-values (map* dec channel)]
  (consume incremented-values (fn [i] (println "Incremented value: "
                                              i)))
  (consume decremented-values (fn [i] (println "Decremented value: "
                                              i)))
  (accept channel 1)
  (accept channel 2)
  (accept channel 3))

[ifesdjeen]

(let [channel (create)
      incremented-values (map* inc channel)
      decremented-values (map* dec channel)]
  (consume incremented-values (fn [i] (println "Incremented value: "
                                              i)))
  (consume decremented-values (fn [i] (println "Decremented value: "
                                              i)))
  (accept channel 1)
  (accept channel 2)
  (accept channel 3))

[ifesdjeen]

Yup, that seems right (sorry example somehow didn't get updated in right). I agree that def is a bad pattern here :/

[michaelklishin]

Seems to be superseded by #3 (and no longer merges cleanly).