Closed slp closed 4 years ago
@rbradford @sameo ping?
This code was newly written so wouldn't be covered by the BSD-3-Clause code coming (originally) from crosvm
Hmm.. I'm fine with having only the Apache-2.0 license, but given that the commits come from CH, which is covered by both licenses, I understand it should be covered by both too.
Each file in CH has an individual license. These files are Apache 2.0.
Oh, yes, you're right. Thanks for the clarification!
I've just noticed this crate is just licensed as Apache-2.0, while Cloud Hypervisor has an hybrid Apache-2.0+BSD-3-Clause licensing model.
Was this done on purpose or just something coming from the crate template?