Open carlhoerberg opened 1 month ago
Maybe we should have some optional argument for message/queue properties for both Client#rpc_call
, Client#rpc_server
and RPCClient#call
? Or is that too low level?
Wondering if rpc_call
should be skipped, and recommend use of RPCClient
instead. It's important to close the RPCClient
after use though, otherwise channel leak.
Wondering if
rpc_call
should be skipped, and recommend use ofRPCClient
instead. It's important to close theRPCClient
after use though, otherwise channel leak.
I don't think it's a problem to have both.
High level client support for RPC using direct reply queues.