Closed chris-wood closed 1 year ago
These benchmarks let one quickly compare the cost difference between two different HPKE ciphersuites (KEM, KDF, AEAD).
Here's a sample of the output when running the benchmarks (go test -bench=.) in the HPKE directory:
go test -bench=.
✗ go test -bench=. goos: darwin goarch: arm64 pkg: github.com/cloudflare/circl/hpke BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/SetupSender-0020-0001-0001-10 18325 65444 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/SetupReceiver-0020-0001-0001-10 28868 41394 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/Encrypt-0020-0001-0001-10 14436075 84.96 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/Decrypt-0020-0001-0001-10 14667714 83.58 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/SetupSender-0030-0001-0001-10 13032 91840 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/SetupReceiver-0030-0001-0001-10 15948 75430 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/Encrypt-0030-0001-0001-10 14285422 83.86 ns/op BenchmarkHpkeRoundTrip/Decrypt-0030-0001-0001-10 14927398 83.00 ns/op PASS ok github.com/cloudflare/circl/hpke 16.127s
Bit ad hoc, but fine by me.
Is there a better approach we should take?
These benchmarks let one quickly compare the cost difference between two different HPKE ciphersuites (KEM, KDF, AEAD).
Here's a sample of the output when running the benchmarks (
go test -bench=.
) in the HPKE directory: