Open flisky opened 8 years ago
Thanks for your contribution! Can you please provide test cases for this addition inside t/sanity.t
similar to TEST 2?
I'll try it in next few days.
Testcase added.
A known issue -
the directive udp_reply
is required, but we won't call sock:receive()
, so the following warning occurs:
WARNING: udp server failed to send reply: Connection refused
Is it acceptable for us? @agentzh, @dndx, Any thoughts on this?
:thumbsup:
@dndx can you take a look?
I think maybe @p0pr0ck5 intersted? Thx,
such as imuxsock from rsyslog