search

cloudfoundry-attic / cephfs-bosh-release

Apache License 2.0
10 stars 7 forks source link

Multi node ceph #2

Open marcus-sds opened 7 years ago

marcus-sds commented 7 years ago

Is this release for ceph multi node?

cf-gitbot commented 7 years ago

We have created an issue in Pivotal Tracker to manage this:

https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/150474538

The labels on this github issue will be updated when the story is started.

julian-hj commented 7 years ago

kind of....we install 3 nodes but we put them all on the same VM, so we are definitely not set up for production. This was the first volume service we developed back in the very early days of CF volume services. Also we only provision CephFS, not block or object, FWIW.

marcus-sds commented 7 years ago

3 nodes mean 3osd,right? When I tested 3osd are located at same volume also. Do you have the plan to create qouta plan and multi vm cluster?

On Aug 24, 2017 2:58 AM, "Julian Hjortshoj" notifications@github.com wrote:

kind of....we install 3 nodes but we put them all on the same VM, so we are definitely not set up for production. This was the first volume service we developed back in the very early days of CF volume services. Also we only provision CephFS, not block or object, FWIW.

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cephfs-bosh-release/issues/2#issuecomment-324414413, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVx7oakOWwa15BaTo9sB5-iGBpqI7dssks5sbGhhgaJpZM4O_t39 .

julian-hj commented 7 years ago

As of today, we don't currently plan to make any further enhancements to this release. We are open to pull requests though :)

marcus-sds commented 7 years ago

ok I am a newbumie..I will try without bosh first.

On Aug 24, 2017 8:38 AM, "Julian Hjortshoj" notifications@github.com wrote:

As of today, we don't currently plan to make any further enhancements to this release. We are open to pull requests though :)

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cephfs-bosh-release/issues/2#issuecomment-324491954, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVx7obR5OiHRDGJyENvM1t9UFLPuhEABks5sbLfogaJpZM4O_t39 .

marcus-sds commented 7 years ago

I updated to jewel and tested with quota option. You can refer https://github.com/marcus-sds/cf-ceph-sds-release.

julian-hj commented 7 years ago

Hi @marcus-sds, we were actually thinking about stopping support for this bosh release and moving it into the cloudfoundry-attic github org, as we have not seen much usage for it, or even issues like this one posted.

But it sounds as though you have a real use case? If so, can you describe what your use case looks like? And are you interested to contribute your code changes back to the cloud foundry foundation?

marcus-sds commented 7 years ago

Hi.We are using aws and scalable nas which support restricting quota to user with small shared persistent fs. Also wanted no dependency with iaas and no additional money. If I can, I wish to contribute.

On Oct 20, 2017 02:44, "Julian Hjortshoj" notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi @marcus-sds https://github.com/marcus-sds, we were actually thinking about stopping support for this bosh release and moving it into the cloudfoundry-attic github org, as we have not seen much usage for it, or even issues like this one posted.

But it sounds as though you have a real use case? If so, can you describe what your use case looks like? And are you interested to contribute your code changes back to the cloud foundry foundation?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cloudfoundry-incubator/cephfs-bosh-release/issues/2#issuecomment-337983805, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVx7oacIVPRTVruuBT1rcvfc9vNTbxtGks5st4qBgaJpZM4O_t39 .