Closed Amit-PivotalLabs closed 8 years ago
We have created an issue in Pivotal Tracker to manage this. You can view the current status of your issue at: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/114135363.
Switched loggregator approver to @wfernandes since he is the new anchor. @Amit-PivotalLabs can you make sure he has access to this repository.
@roxtar done.
Three teams left @sreetummidi, @mbhave @Jim-Campbell, @wfernandes @dieucao, @utako
Just waiting for @sreetummidi and @mbhave to approve.
UAA Approval Updated !
Thanks, Sree Tummidi Sr. Product Manager Identity - Pivotal Cloud Foundry
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:53 AM, Dieu Cao notifications@github.com wrote:
Just waiting for @sreetummidi https://github.com/sreetummidi and @mbhave https://github.com/mbhave to approve.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-final-release-election/issues/3#issuecomment-187707368 .
$ git push origin f67ebb734d45ba17dacc8e89c5f2758a50a844a9:release-elect
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
To git@github.com:cloudfoundry/cf-release
3de108d..f67ebb7 f67ebb734d45ba17dacc8e89c5f2758a50a844a9 -> release-elect
You can follow the final release build here: https://mega.ci.cf-app.com/pipelines/cf-release/jobs/create-final-release/builds/14
Previous build failed due to changes in CI scripts, fixed and triggered new build: https://mega.ci.cf-app.com/pipelines/cf-release/jobs/create-final-release/builds/15
CF v231 is now available: http://bosh.io/releases/github.com/cloudfoundry/cf-release?version=231
cf-release Release Candidate SHA for v231 Deploy: f67ebb734d45ba17dacc8e89c5f2758a50a844a9
Details: Not Available due to limitation in
announce-rc
Concourse job. This will eventually be fixed.Please read these instructions, as they changed on 4 Nov 2015.
@Amit-PivotalLabs, @robdimsdale: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the release integration team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@Amit-PivotalLabs, @ryanmoran: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the infrastructure team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@shalako, @crhino: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the routing team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@sreetummidi, @mbhave: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the identity team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@Jim-Campbell, @wfernandes Does this cf-release SHA look good for the LAMB team? Do the a1 logging metrics look nominal? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@dieucao, @utako: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the CAPI team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@Dannyzen, @jtarchie: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the Buildpacks and Stacks team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
@nebhale, @cgfrost: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the Java Buildpack team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?
v3.6
@ematpl, @luan: Can you provide a compatible diego-release SHA?
@fraenkel, @sykesm: Does this cf-release SHA look good for the DEA + HM9000 team? Any bugs, regressions, or incomplete features of concern?