Open mrdavidlaing opened 11 years ago
I need to know where I can dump my specially compiled tomcat tgz with mod_mono and all the config wrapped up into a nice neat little package.
If I understand correctly, you have a compiled apache + tomcat tgz that you want the buildpack to pull down during the staging phase.
If so, then stick in an s3 bucket, and make sure it's publically accessible.
Then write a container for the buildpack that detects when to activate this container, and have that container extension download from s3. On 18 Oct 2013 23:35, "Nicholas Terry" notifications@github.com wrote:
I need to know where I can dump my specially compiled tomcat tgz with mod_mono and all the config wrapped up into a nice neat little package.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/.net-buildpack/issues/17#issuecomment-26635009 .
I can stick it in an s3 bucket, but isnt there an official bucket that holds all the binary artifacts? If not, im happy to host it.
Not tomcat, but apache, yes
Only as official as my s3 bucket :)
To start, why don't you host it in yours, and then we can relocate it to mine once it stabilises.
On Monday, October 21, 2013, Nicholas Terry wrote:
I can stick it in an s3 bucket, but isnt there an official bucket that holds all the binary artifacts? If not, im happy to host it.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/.net-buildpack/issues/17#issuecomment-26732319 .
David Laing Open source @ City Index - github.com/cityindex http://davidlaing.com Twitter: @davidlaing
@nterry - Bump?
Sorry, Ive been extremely busy lately. Ill try to get it added and merged as soon as I can.
No worries - feel free to sent a partially completed PR; I'm happy to provide feedback
On Wednesday, 30 October 2013, Nicholas Terry wrote:
Sorry, Ive been extremely busy lately. Ill try to get it added and merged as soon as I can.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/.net-buildpack/issues/17#issuecomment-27434203 .
David Laing Open source @ City Index - github.com/cityindex http://davidlaing.com Twitter: @davidlaing
so it appears that I lost my compiled version, so im going to make it again. I know the prefix should begin with /app, but whats the exact prefix i should use to follow convention?
I am using /app/vendor/httpd unless you want something else?
I also need to know the prefix for the latest mono. Do you use a version-specific one, or something like /app/vendor/mono?
/app/vendor/{dependancyname}/
Also, if you could include the script used to build the dependency, or have an extra builder-{dependancy} repo that would be great.
On 2 Nov 2013 00:46, "Nicholas Terry" notifications@github.com wrote:
so it appears that I lost my compiled version, so im going to make it again. I know the prefix should begin with /app, but whats the exact prefix i should use to follow convention?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
@nterry - any updates?
Yeah. Made the zip with the needed stuff in it. Just need to add it and code it up. On Nov 22, 2013 4:36 AM, "David Laing" notifications@github.com wrote:
@nterry https://github.com/nterry - any updates?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cloudfoundry-community/.net-buildpack/issues/17#issuecomment-29066472 .
Asp.net container is well under way. I'm hoping to have it done soon. (Just need to find the time ;))
I am looking for a mono buildpack for my ASP.NET MVC 4.x version. Can someone help me?
Thanks
Create a container to support ASP.NET MVC (similar to the console container )