search

cloudnode-pro / components

Base classes for web components
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
0 stars 0 forks source link

Fix publish CI #6

Closed zefir-git closed 2 weeks ago

coderabbitai[bot] commented 2 weeks ago

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces several modifications to the CI workflow configuration, specifically within the publish job. Key changes include the renaming of the Download artifacts step to Download build artifact, along with the explicit specification of the artifact name as package. A new step, Extract build package, has been added to facilitate the extraction of the downloaded package using the tar command. Additionally, the workflow now includes a step to Copy package.json to build package, ensuring that the package.json file is included in the build package directory. The Set version from release tag step has been updated to operate from the root of the package directory instead of ./package/package. The Publish to NPM step has been modified to execute the publish command in the background, and a new step, Await NPM publish completion, has been added to ensure the workflow waits for the NPM publish process to finish.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

bug

Suggested reviewers

📜 Recent review details **Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI** **Review profile: ASSERTIVE**
📥 Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6eeb2fd11875152cac48cdb3fb78d7466b6fce83 and 1baed937e0a64d45f4e80e45b5eafcd95245aa92.
📒 Files selected for processing (1) * .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (5)
`66-70`: **Excellent improvement in artifact handling** The renaming of the step to "Download build artifact" and the explicit specification of the artifact name as "package" enhance clarity and reduce potential errors in the CI process. This change aligns well with the PR objective of fixing the publish CI. --- `80-80`: **Improved workflow readability** The addition of an empty line after the "Copy package.json to build package" step enhances the overall readability of the workflow file by clearly separating logical sections. This is a small but welcome improvement to the file structure. --- Line range hint `1-100`: **Overall improvements to the publish CI process** The changes made to this workflow file significantly enhance the publish CI process. The explicit artifact naming, addition of the extraction step, and inclusion of package.json copying all contribute to a more robust and clear workflow. These modifications align well with the PR objective of fixing the publish CI. While the changes are generally positive, implementing the suggested error handling and existence checks would further improve the workflow's resilience. Consider addressing these minor points to maximise the benefits of this update. --- `71-73`: _:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Consider adding error handling to the extraction step** The addition of the "Extract build package" step is a necessary and appropriate improvement. However, to enhance the robustness of the workflow, consider implementing error handling as previously suggested: ```yaml - name: Extract build package working-directory: ./package run: tar -xzf cldn-components-0.0.0-dev.tgz || { echo "Extraction failed"; exit 1; } ``` This modification will ensure the workflow fails explicitly if the extraction encounters any issues, making troubleshooting easier. --- `78-79`: _:hammer_and_wrench: Refactor suggestion_ **Enhance robustness of package.json copying** The addition of the "Copy package.json to build package" step is crucial for the npm publishing process. To further improve this step, consider implementing the previously suggested existence check: ```yaml - name: Copy package.json to build package run: | if [ -f package.json ]; then cp package.json package/package else echo "Error: package.json not found" >&2 exit 1 fi ``` This modification will provide a clear error message if package.json is missing, aiding in troubleshooting potential issues.
--- Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
❤️ Share - [X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A&url=https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [Mastodon](https://mastodon.social/share?text=I%20just%20used%20%40coderabbitai%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20the%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai) - [Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/submit?title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&text=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code.%20Check%20it%20out%3A%20https%3A//coderabbit.ai) - [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoderabbit.ai&mini=true&title=Great%20tool%20for%20code%20review%20-%20CodeRabbit&summary=I%20just%20used%20CodeRabbit%20for%20my%20code%20review%2C%20and%20it%27s%20fantastic%21%20It%27s%20free%20for%20OSS%20and%20offers%20a%20free%20trial%20for%20proprietary%20code)
🪧 Tips ### Chat There are 3 ways to chat with [CodeRabbit](https://coderabbit.ai): - Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example: - `I pushed a fix in commit , please review it.` - `Generate unit testing code for this file.` - `Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.` - Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples: - `@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.` - `@coderabbitai modularize this function.` - PR comments: Tag `@coderabbitai` in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples: - `@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.` - `@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.` - `@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.` - `@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.` Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. ### CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments) - `@coderabbitai pause` to pause the reviews on a PR. - `@coderabbitai resume` to resume the paused reviews. - `@coderabbitai review` to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. - `@coderabbitai full review` to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. - `@coderabbitai summary` to regenerate the summary of the PR. - `@coderabbitai resolve` resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. - `@coderabbitai configuration` to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. - `@coderabbitai help` to get help. ### Other keywords and placeholders - Add `@coderabbitai ignore` anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add `@coderabbitai summary` to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add `@coderabbitai` anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically. ### CodeRabbit Configuration File (`.coderabbit.yaml`) - You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a `.coderabbit.yaml` file to the root of your repository. - Please see the [configuration documentation](https://docs.coderabbit.ai/guides/configure-coderabbit) for more information. - If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: `# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json` ### Documentation and Community - Visit our [Documentation](https://coderabbit.ai/docs) for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit. - Join our [Discord Community](http://discord.gg/coderabbit) to get help, request features, and share feedback. - Follow us on [X/Twitter](https://twitter.com/coderabbitai) for updates and announcements.