Closed SchulteMarkus closed 4 years ago
This repository started as a PoC to learn how to write Quarkus extensions. So this current name was obvious and not so wrong. Thanks for the link - I didn't know about these efforts. Under these circumstances I can agree to the name change. The impact should be minimal, since there are no public artifacts yet.
;-)
I'd suggest to change the repository name as well - not just the artifacts (#9).
And maybe change the feature name in ProblemProcessor, too.
And the README is outdated right now
The lack of CI is noticeable..at least for compilation errors and the like.. ;-) This will certainly be one of my next tasks
The README can certainly be further improved. But the renaming of the artifacts and the repository is completed.
In my opinion the name of this extension is to reduced, I think a more specific quarkus-zalando-problem-extension would be better. Background: Microprofile itself seems to have discovered, that it would be a good idea to implement RFC-7807, see https://github.com/eclipse/microprofile-sandbox/tree/master/proposals/problem-details. I can imagine there will be a "Microprofile problem" or "Quarkus problem" in the future. If this happens, "quarkus-problem-extension" can be confusing, I think.