search

cloudtransformer / umbraco-extended-distributed-calling

An Umbraco package to allow developers to write and use custom distributed calling providers.
3 stars 4 forks source link

This is built in to the core, just needs to by made public #1

Open Shazwazza opened 10 years ago

Shazwazza commented 10 years ago

Hi, this isn't an issue, but thought I'd let you know that this functionality is built into the core, it just waiting to make it public pending some further functionality. For reference have a look at two interfaces in the Umbraco core : IServerMessenger and IServerRegistrar

danlister commented 10 years ago

@Shandem Thanks for letting me know. Thats awesome news! Would it be worthwhile adding the Amazon provider from this package to the Core or would you prefer it to be kept as an external package?

Shazwazza commented 10 years ago

Def keep it outside the core, things like this make perfect plugins. Well be publicizing these in the next version - most likely 7.2. The last thing before we do that is to complete the task to batch all dist calls in one request. Based on that the interfaces may change which is why they're not public. However, if you want to try these interfaces, you could run a custom build for now. These interfaces are actively used in the core now (since 6.x). They will probably make what you are doing much much easier. I also have a demo of an implementation for Azure websites in could share (just need to see if I'm allowed)

Sent from my phone On Mar 20, 2014 9:31 PM, "Dan Lister" notifications@github.com wrote:

@Shandem https://github.com/Shandem Thanks for letting me know. Thats awesome news! Would it be worthwhile adding the Amazon provider from this package to the Core or would you prefer it to be kept as an external package?

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/agebase/umbraco-extended-distributed-calling/issues/1#issuecomment-38152556 .

danlister commented 10 years ago

That would be great if you could. Once you guys have made everything public, I'll rewrite this package to use your new implementation. Thanks for you help!