There have been many requests that we use a proper filter transmission function for the continuum_bands.ini bands we predict. We now use a boxcar function with a uniform transmission.
Adam Carnall has pointed me to this web site:
http://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/svo/theory/fps/
a part of the VO, which gives filter functions for a large number of bands. We could use these to do a better integration.
{
"status": "new",
"changetime": "2019-02-04T13:02:49Z",
"_ts": "1549285369825011",
"description": "There have been many requests that we use a proper filter transmission function for the continuum_bands.ini bands we predict. We now use a boxcar function with a uniform transmission.\n\nAdam Carnall has pointed me to this web site:\nhttp://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/svo/theory/fps/\na part of the VO, which gives filter functions for a large number of bands. We could use these to do a better integration.",
"reporter": "gary",
"cc": "",
"resolution": "",
"time": "2017-08-04T19:48:57Z",
"component": "radiative transfer",
"summary": "Filter transmission functions for continuum_bands.ini file",
"priority": "good to do",
"keywords": "",
"version": "trunk",
"milestone": "no milestone",
"owner": "nobody",
"type": "enhancement"
}
reported by: @CloudyLex
There have been many requests that we use a proper filter transmission function for the continuum_bands.ini bands we predict. We now use a boxcar function with a uniform transmission.
Adam Carnall has pointed me to this web site: http://svo2.cab.inta-csic.es/svo/theory/fps/ a part of the VO, which gives filter functions for a large number of bands. We could use these to do a better integration.
Migrated from https://www.nublado.org/ticket/395