The Chianti levels are currently being reindexed to skip levels of 0 energy. This creates a disparity between the index printed with 'save lines labels' and the actual data files.
For instance, in C17, LineLabels.txt contains the line:
The upper level index has changed from 30 to 25. This is because the unknown energy levels are skipped, and the levels reindexed. From chianti/fe/fe_24/fe_24.elvlc:
A user looking at the output of 'save lines labels' will mistakenly think that the upper level of this particular line is the level with the index 25 (first column), instead of the true one with index 30.
{
"status": "new",
"changetime": "2019-09-25T15:51:09Z",
"_ts": "1569426669474795",
"description": "The Chianti levels are currently being reindexed to skip levels of 0 energy. This creates a disparity between the index printed with 'save lines labels' and the actual data files.\n\nFor instance, in C17, LineLabels.txt contains the line:\n{{{\n141866 Fe24 1.86110A # Chianti, 1 30\n}}}\nwhile at the head of the trunk, the same line is:\n{{{\n150323 Fe24 1.86110A # type: t, index=1, 25 Elow=0 Chianti,\n}}}\n\nThe upper level index has changed from 30 to 25. This is because the unknown energy levels are skipped, and the levels reindexed. From chianti/fe/fe_24/fe_24.elvlc:\n{{{\n 16 10 1s2.5s 2 0 S 0.5 2 13925450.000 126.898041 13935076.000 126.985760\n 17 11 1s2.5p 2 1 P 0.5 2 0.000 0.000000 13957516.000 127.190248\n 18 11 1s2.5p 2 1 P 1.5 4 13948900.000 127.111733 13965161.000 127.259914\n 19 12 1s2.5d 2 2 D 1.5 4 13960500.000 127.217440 13974391.000 127.344024\n 20 12 1s2.5d 2 2 D 2.5 6 13965300.000 127.261181 13976940.000 127.367253\n 21 13 1s2.5f 2 3 F 2.5 6 0.000 0.000000 13977510.000 127.372447\n 22 13 1s2.5f 2 3 F 3.5 8 0.000 0.000000 13978798.000 127.384184\n 23 14 1s2.5g 2 4 G 3.5 8 0.000 0.000000 13978807.000 127.384266\n 24 14 1s2.5g 2 4 G 4.5 10 0.000 0.000000 13979582.000 127.391328\n 25 15 1s.2s2 2 0 S 0.5 2 53235800.000 485.120319 53233806.201 485.102150\n 26 16 1s.2s.2p(3P) 4 1 P 0.5 2 53343000.000 486.097197 53337042.830 486.042911\n 27 16 1s.2s.2p(3P) 4 1 P 1.5 4 53367691.204 486.322200 53367691.204 486.322200\n 28 16 1s.2s.2p(3P) 4 1 P 2.5 6 53461249.399 487.174765 53461249.399 487.174765\n 29 16 1s.2s.2p(3P) 2 1 P 0.5 2 53663900.000 489.021453 53654818.077 488.938692\n 30 16 1s.2s.2p(3P) 2 1 P 1.5 4 53732200.000 489.643848 53733858.621 489.658963\n}}}\n\nA user looking at the output of 'save lines labels' will mistakenly think that the upper level of this particular line is the level with the index 25 (first column), instead of the true one with index 30.",
"reporter": "mchatzikos",
"cc": "",
"resolution": "",
"time": "2019-09-25T15:51:09Z",
"component": "atomic/molecular data base",
"summary": "Chianti level indexing is wrong",
"priority": "blocker",
"keywords": "",
"version": "trunk",
"milestone": "c19 branch",
"owner": "nobody",
"type": "defect - wrong answer"
}
reported by: @mchatzikos
The Chianti levels are currently being reindexed to skip levels of 0 energy. This creates a disparity between the index printed with 'save lines labels' and the actual data files.
For instance, in C17, LineLabels.txt contains the line:
while at the head of the trunk, the same line is:
The upper level index has changed from 30 to 25. This is because the unknown energy levels are skipped, and the levels reindexed. From chianti/fe/fe_24/fe_24.elvlc:
A user looking at the output of 'save lines labels' will mistakenly think that the upper level of this particular line is the level with the index 25 (first column), instead of the true one with index 30.
Migrated from https://www.nublado.org/ticket/429