Hello, the numbers you report here differ from the paper.
Is the version of the paper using the heatmaps? If yes, do you have numbers without heatmaps? They would help a lot.
Are these new numbers using the same experimental framework reported in the paper? Batch size, number of iterations, etc.?
I also found that some of the architectures do not match with the ones reported in the paper. For instance, the discriminator max_dim goes up to 512 (in the paper says 1024), and the mapping network is different as well. Is there going to be an updated arxiv version?
[EDIT]. If AFHQ does not use heatmaps, why the numbers are also different from the paper?
Hello, the numbers you report here differ from the paper.
Thank you.