Closed whitegon closed 3 years ago
I find there is no difference in the training result. But, the VAD which is implemented by torchaudio is a little bit slow. Each wav file needs about 500~800ms to compute VAD. Does anyone has used the other VAD implementation?
Face the same problem,have you found the replacement vad method?
Face the same problem,have you found the replacement vad method?
I use the webrtcvad to preprocess the file before I start to train.
I find there is no difference in the training result. But, the VAD which is implemented by torchaudio is a little bit slow. Each wav file needs about 500~800ms to compute VAD. Does anyone has used the other VAD implementation?
Hi, how about the performance after using the VAD?
I am adding VAD in the preprocessing about wav file, and I find there is a difference between wavfile.read and torchaudio.load. Why you use scipy.io not torchaudio?