Open clvcooke opened 9 years ago
What functions do you have in mind?
On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 17:57 Colin Langdon Vernon Cooke < notifications@github.com> wrote:
What does everyone think of moving quite a few of the functions out of the matrix class and into a new hpp/cpp utility functions file. This would allow us to make use of the functions without being restricted to having to create a Matrix object to do so.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/clvc/MatrixMath/issues/9.
Ex: Matrix transpose(Matrix); rather than Matrix Matrix::transpose();
Possibly the inverse, transpose, determinant and cof. But now that I think about it the implementation wouldn't change much. The code would look more like normal math, but almost nothing else would change. Now that I think about it, its probably not worth it just to make the code look more like my math notes
Well the whole point of this class is to make Matrices easy and intuitive to use for coders so it may be worth it to add those.
What does everyone think of moving quite a few of the functions out of the matrix class and into a new hpp/cpp utility functions file. This would allow us to make use of the functions without being restricted to having to create a Matrix object to do so.