cmclean5 / PublicHealthModels

R implementation of popular ML models for health care data
0 stars 0 forks source link

Comparison of tumour-based (Petersen Index) and inflammation-based (Glasgow Prognostic Score) scoring systems in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer #24

Open cmclean5 opened 1 year ago

cmclean5 commented 1 year ago

TL;DR

This paper compares the Petersen Index (PI) and the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in patients undergoing curative resection of colon cancer.

Paper Link

https://www.nature.com/articles/6604926#Abs1

Author/Institution

Roxburgh, C (University of Glasgow)

Overview

Results of this study validate the use of the PI in predicting cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing elective potentially curative for Dukes’ B colon cancer. Furthermore, the results indicate that the mGPS further stratifies those patients with Dukes’ B and single node positive Dukes’ C cancers, classified as low risk by the PI. The PI and mGPS scoring systems could, therefore, be combined at a multi-disciplinary meeting to identify those patients with colorectal cancer who have undergone potentially curative surgery but are at high risk of cancer related death.

Contributions and Distinctions from Previous Works

Methods

colorectal cancer. survival analysis

Results

Cite

Roxburgh, C., Crozier, J., Maxwell, F. et al. Comparison of tumour-based (Petersen Index) and inflammation-based (Glasgow Prognostic Score) scoring systems in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer. Br J Cancer 100, 701–706 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6604926

Comments