I'm imagining being able to define a union with only single-field cases. The union itself will be the union in the schema, and the type of each field is another type in the schema.
I won't immediately work on this, but it would be nice to have this feature.
I'm imagining being able to define a union with only single-field cases. The union itself will be the union in the schema, and the type of each field is another type in the schema.
I won't immediately work on this, but it would be nice to have this feature.