Open scfleming opened 10 years ago
Ok. Should this be sensitive to the distinction between raw vs. effective exposure time? In general, expt_eff ~= 0.8*expt_raw
due mostly to dead time.
Open to interpretation…my primary reason for the request was to avoid the situation where you make a movie, but because we now use fixed-width bins there are frames that straddle a gap in the eclipses and you get partial bins…maybe an even simpler method would be not to calculate an effective fill factor of a bin, but just ask if the bin starts before the first data point in a set of observations or ends after the last data point in a set of observations, where "set of observations" is defined reasonably.
Also I would definitely assign this to v>1.1 !
It would be nice to have the option to only create FITS frames in the data cubes for those intervals that have "full" data in them. There can be a few ways to define this, probably the simplest is some sort of coverage threshold. E.g., if a frame only has 10 seconds of data and I ask for a 30 second frame I would like to have that frame not included in my output FITS data cube. But if it has 27 seconds of coverage, I would like it. So maybe the parameter accepts some fraction like this above which frames will be included in the data dube, and it defaults to 0% so that ever frame is included that has at least one photon event in it.