Closed taylor13 closed 4 years ago
I agree that we should wait for CMIP7. This is a feature inherited from CMIP5, so users will not be supplied. I agree that it is likely that data producers would cope, but it would be confusing to data users if we end up with two different implementations for this variable.
@larsbarring noted in https://github.com/cf-convention/discuss/issues/371 that in the Amon table, the monthly mean daily max and daily min temperatures (
tasmax
andtasmin
) should have a "climatology" axis rather than a regular axis. I'm not sure whether changing this for CMIP6 will mess up those in the middle of writing output (I don't think it would), but we should definitely correct this for CMIP7.The difference in a "climatology" time axis and a regular one is that the name of the "bounds" variable is stored in the
climatology
attribute, not in thebounds
attribute. I'm not sure iftasmax
andtasmin
in Amon should be functions of time3, time4, or some newly defined time axis.Note that for these variables the actual values that should be stored in the variable pointed to by the
climatology
attribute would be identical to the values currently written to the variable pointed to by thebounds
attribute.