Closed rfriese closed 7 years ago
Dear all,
after fixing the obvious things there's still something broken in the tt background estimation when comparing the status of 19th october: http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~friese/plots_archive/2016_11_04/old/ with today: http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~friese/plots_archive/2016_11_04/new/ while the plots above are done with an Artus run on the old skims, the problem does not disappear with the new one (MVA MET based): http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~friese/plots_archive/2016_11_04/newinputs/
Does anyone know where the problem might be? As I already wrote in my mail, it's not possible to tackle it easily with the usual approach. Artus is for all plots on the master.
Cheers, Raphael
I think this has been solved, hasn't it?
yes, thanks for the reminder.
Dear all,
after fixing the obvious things there's still something broken in the tt background estimation when comparing the status of 19th october: http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~friese/plots_archive/2016_11_04/old/ with today: http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~friese/plots_archive/2016_11_04/new/ while the plots above are done with an Artus run on the old skims, the problem does not disappear with the new one (MVA MET based): http://www-ekp.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~friese/plots_archive/2016_11_04/newinputs/
Does anyone know where the problem might be? As I already wrote in my mail, it's not possible to tackle it easily with the usual approach. Artus is for all plots on the master.
Cheers, Raphael