stefano-maggiolo
commented
11 years ago In an ideal world, SS should filter submissions by timestamp, and we should have a clearly defined analysis mode where all scores (retroactively) are public and there is not such a word as "token". I think this can be done, but not for 1.0.
As for your suggestions to change the behavior:
- I agree on showing submissions in phase +2;
- I mildly disagree on showing submissions in phase +1;
- I strongly disagree on allowing contestant to play tokens in phases > 0.
In all cases, I would suggest having a "banner" (i.e., a bar under the login bar) with clearly written "Contest ended" or "Analysis mode".
giomasce
lw
A contest can be in three phases: pre-contest, contest and post-contest. CWS, in addition, defines a user-related actual_phase which takes the contest.per_user_time and user.starting_time into consideration for USACO-like contests. So we have the following "actual" phases:
At the moment all phases except phase 0 are handled almost the same by CWS: the user can't do anything except reading the documentation, view announcements and messages and ask questions (and read answers). On phase -1 there's a small difference: the user can start his/hers per_user_time. On phase 0 the user can do almost anything: read statements, download attachments, send submissions and usertests, use tokens, etc. (but not start his/her per_user_time).
We may want to change this behavior (at least partially). For example we may want to give a user access to his/her submissions even on phases > 0, to allow to see the results of last-minute submissions which may get fully evaluated only after the contest ends (of course we would continue to block new submissions). Also, it could make sense to allow to use tokens even after the contest. We should also decide if we want to implement the analysis mode properly, or if we think it's enough to do as we did at the IOI (extend the contest length and give infinite tokens).
This issue is the right place to discuss all of this.