Closed bdorney closed 5 years ago
I did a double check of the scaling factors, e.g.:
And they are all correct.
The values that are there now are the "Nominal Current" in Table 9 and the "Nominal Voltage" in Table 10.
The values that are there now are the "Nominal Current" in Table 9 and the "Nominal Voltage" in Table 10.
Looks like we'll have to ask the VFAT3 team what the difference is...
VFAT3 team reports that Tables 9 and 10 should be used for configuring and data taking.
Closing as "NotABugWontFix"
Brief summary of issue
Turns out some of the nominal values reported here:
https://github.com/cms-gem-daq-project/gem-plotting-tools/blob/1fdf018d8f965383a05955c93d9422f9beb383f9/utils/anaInfo.py#L17-L34
Does not match the values reported in Tables 12 & 13 of the VFAT3 Manual V2.2.
Specific Concern for
CFG_HYST
In a private communication the VFAT3 team stated also that the
CFG_HYST
register should be kept at a value below0xA
. We should add a constraint on this register.Types of issue
Expected Behavior
The DAC's below need to have their nominal values updated.
Additionally we should set a constraint on the
CFG_HYST
register to provide values always below0xA
.Current Behavior
Specifically the following DAC's do not match the value looked in VFAT3 manual:
Context (for feature requests)
Our DAC scan analysis is not assigning the correct DAC value to the above registers. We are not using the chip correctly.
Your Environment