Closed AndrewLevin closed 4 years ago
We should verify that the expected behaviour is reproduced in each of the following situations:
chamber_config
? or name comes from the tree?chamber_config
It should now fail in the case one is reanalyzing old data, but for which the chamber config is not specified on the command line, otherwise, there will be a possibility to incorrectly take the config from chamber_config
based on specified (slot,link,vfat)
We should verify that the expected behaviour is reproduced in each of the following situations:
- New data taken, no special arguments (all info comes from the new tree)
I have tested that this worked.
- New data taken, specify indices, name comes from
chamber_config
? or name comes from the tree?
The name comes from the tree.
- Old data taken, specify indices, name comes from
chamber_config
The name comes from the chamber_config
.
It should now fail in the case one is reanalyzing old data, but for which the chamber config is not specified on the command line, otherwise, there will be a possibility to incorrectly take the config from
chamber_config
based on specified(slot,link,vfat)
One of the three options for the chamber config is a required argument now.
A dictionary of output files in the sbitThresh analysis routine was being incorrectly filled with only one OH key, causing a crash.
Description
A loop over the OHs was being performed, but the OH key was not being set inside the loop, so it was always the last OH key from the previous loop.
Types of changes
Motivation and Context
Resolves https://github.com/cms-gem-daq-project/gem-plotting-tools/issues/253
How Has This Been Tested?
Yes, I tested it with the example reported here:
https://mattermost.web.cern.ch/cms-gem-daq/pl/mtab9kigg7yytkixet8k91b8ko
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Checklist: