Closed bdorney closed 6 years ago
I do believe we are on v1.0.1 for a long time already
But shouldn't the above also have a line like:
ASSERT(rpc.load_module("vfat3", "vfat3 v1.0.1"));
Otherwise what is loading the configure routines?
It should be done in rpcman library, not in tthis one. This one will be even more cleaned in future
Understood, closing issue.
Brief summary of issue
So trying to debug problems experienced:
http://cmsonline.cern.ch/cms-elog/1050906 http://cmsonline.cern.ch/cms-elog/1050905
Basically modules defined in
rwreg.so
and in:Function without problem, but those in xhal (lubrpcman.so) do not. And I'm wondering what the reason is.
Also I see the load here is version 1.0.1. Did we change this from 1.0.0 recently or was it always 1.0.0? Perhaps one of the issues I'm facing is that there is some compilation issue in which only a subset of the libaries on the DAQ machines (or on the cards themselves) are using 1.0.0?
I will try to recompile the libraries and place them on the cards...
Perhaps a separate issue on the xhal repo should be opened, but I am not yet sure what the problem is.
Types of issue
Current Behavior
https://github.com/cms-gem-daq-project/reg_utils/blob/aa7e284221dd859f9a80bd036784c78edb788fcd/rwreg/x86_64/src/rwreg.cc#L50-L56
Your Environment
yum info
?