Closed EmyrClement closed 9 months ago
We should also probably add a requirement that the jet collection is only consumed if fUseJets_
is true:
Maybe that's a comment we can add to the HPS tau PR to master?
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
Attempts to compile this PR succeeded!
Info | Value |
---|---|
return code | 0 |
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -j 8 |
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
I found no issues with the code checks! | Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -k -j 8 code-checks && scram b -k -j 8 code-checks |
I found no issues with the headers! | Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -k -j 8 check-headers |
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
I found 1 files that did not meet formatting requirements:
Please run scram b code-format to auto-apply code formatting |
Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -k -j 8 code-format-all |
We should also probably add a requirement that the jet collection is only consumed if
fUseJets_
is true:Maybe that's a comment we can add to the HPS tau PR to master?
I think it needs to be consumed regardless to be passed to this function:
the result of fUseJets
is passed here too, so without reading too much further I would guess it is fine flagging using jets or not for it's own behavior, but attempting to prevent the read overall may be more trouble than it is worth.
@EmyrClement I've tested that this fix works. I am going to merge this for the v2 tag. Please ASAP open a PR for #1204, #1210, and #1212 to CMSSW (as one PR is probably easiest, but however you can make work).
@aloeliger I won't open a PR in master for this, as it's already fixed in #43848, specifically in the corresponding fillDescriptions, which replaced the python config modified here.
PR description:
A commit that was missed for #1210
PR validation:
Ran L1 sequence, see new collection in output root file.