Closed HaarigerHarald closed 7 months ago
I tested it and it worked fine.
Please merge this ASAP as others can't use the IB.. @aloeliger @epalencia
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
Attempts to compile this PR succeeded!
Info | Value |
---|---|
return code | 0 |
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -j 8 |
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
I found no issues with the code checks! | Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -k -j 8 code-checks && scram b -k -j 8 code-checks |
I found no issues with the headers! | Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -k -j 8 check-headers |
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
I found 1 files that did not meet formatting requirements:
Please run scram b code-format to auto-apply code formatting |
Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b -k -j 8 code-format-all |
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation.
This PR passes available unit tests! | Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 0 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& scram b runtests |
Hello, I'm triggerDoctor. @aloeliger is testing this script for L1T offline software validation
I found a non-zero return code running the relval workflows for this PR! | Info | Value |
---|---|---|
return code | 1 |
|
command | eval scramv1 runtime -sh&& runTheMatrix.py --what upgrade -l 26834.78 |
Hmm. The script output is wrong, but the return code is wrong. Let me check.
HLT overlap. Not this PR's issue.
@artlbv I am merging this PR.
@HaarigerHarald Could you please open a PR for this to CMSSW as soon as practical?
thanks @aloeliger
on
@HaarigerHarald Could you please open a PR for this to CMSSW as soon as practical?
this should be really included in the same PR as https://github.com/cms-l1t-offline/cmssw/pull/1225#issuecomment-2031755976 so more for @duchstf
@artlbv Hello, since it was #1225 was merged, how should I proceed? do I need to create a PR?
@Duchstf actually you probably should not do anything.. the P2GT emulator has not been updated in central yet. the PR is on hold: https://github.com/cms-l1t-offline/cmssw/pull/1207
I really don't want to lose either of these PRs to forgetfulness because we were all so busy with other phase 2 things. We should either:
This fork is only a convenience. Getting it in CMSSW is what actually matters.
Why not open a PR to central that basically includes both #1225 and #1238 ?
@HaarigerHarald @Duchstf Ping again on opening a PR to CMSSW combining #1225 and #1238. Please do not lose these changes.
@Duchstf pls do it as it mostly concerns stuff in the correlator package. You can cherry-pick my commit into your branch and then just open a PR from it.
Edit: I opened a PR now
Fixes #1237