Open mcepeda opened 5 years ago
The tighter PUPPI tune was tested only on MET, while here I see it being used also for jets. Has there been any study of comparing the performance for jets and HT before changing the configuration for those?
On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 9:18 AM Maria Cepeda notifications@github.com wrote:
Hi @rekovic https://github.com/rekovic - the final objects are the puppi ones, can you also adapt line L159 and L174?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cms-l1t-offline/cmssw/issues/734, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEbbR-Ah7gH0AQjHTK0zp1HaDiW17M6sks5uzkbAgaJpZM4Y3E3K .
Not yet. I am integrating this PR right now for testing in the menu and git flagged this as a merge problem. My comment was mainly that if we change something, it should be for PUPPI, not for "PF".
Note line 173 right now: https://github.com/cms-l1t-offline/cmssw/blob/l1t-phase2-v2.16.44/L1Trigger/Configuration/python/SimL1Emulator_cff.py#L173 - if you do not want this, then I think the change should be in line 159 to include the tune for PUPPIMET and in line 173 to remove it from PFJETs.
Hi @rekovic - the final objects are the puppi ones, can you also adapt line L159 and L174?
https://github.com/cms-l1t-offline/cmssw/blob/1fd140b0056ca12b962eea3a03b1f28250d15833/L1Trigger/Configuration/python/SimL1Emulator_cff.py#L159
https://github.com/cms-l1t-offline/cmssw/blob/l1t-phase2-v2.16.44/L1Trigger/Configuration/python/SimL1Emulator_cff.py#L174