This issue is related to the hypernews thread [1] on retrieving and applying energy scale and resolution uncertainties for electrons and photons at the level of nanoAOD post-processing in nanoAOD-tools. In the thread, it was pointed out [2] that
these scale systematics are applied on the
ecal energy only (uncorrected for scales but corrected for regression due to loss etc)
and then further combined an E-p combination is performed to get the final post
scale-smearing corrected p4.
Should we identify these missing variables and add them into nanoAODs? An alternative suggestion is to directly store the scaled (up & down) and smeared energy
I suppose this involves adding the following floats for electrons and photons:
userFloat("energyScaleUp")
userFloat("energyScaleDown")
userFloat("energySigmaUp")
This issue is related to the hypernews thread [1] on retrieving and applying energy scale and resolution uncertainties for electrons and photons at the level of nanoAOD post-processing in nanoAOD-tools. In the thread, it was pointed out [2] that
Should we identify these missing variables and add them into nanoAODs? An alternative suggestion is to directly store the scaled (up & down) and smeared energy I suppose this involves adding the following floats for electrons and photons: userFloat("energyScaleUp") userFloat("energyScaleDown") userFloat("energySigmaUp")
Kind regards, Fikri
[1] https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3713.html [2] https://hypernews.cern.ch/HyperNews/CMS/get/physTools/3713/1/1/1/2/1.html